In Indiana, real estate agents and brokers must adhere to the record-keeping requirements established by the Indiana Real Estate Commission. While the laws do not specifically address text messages, the retention of "communications" relevant to real estate transactions may extend to text messages if they include material information. Here’s a summary of Indiana’s record retention laws and their implications for text messages:

1. Record Retention Requirements

• Under Indiana Code § 25-34.1-3-4 and Indiana Real Estate Commission regulations, real estate brokers are required to retain records of real estate transactions for at least five years.

• The records must include documentation relevant to the transaction, such as contracts, agreements, disclosures, correspondence, and any other materials pertinent to the services provided.

2. Inclusion of Text Messages

• Indiana's record-keeping requirements extend to “correspondence” or "communications" material to the transaction. This can include text messages if they involve:

  • Offers and counteroffers

  • Negotiation details

  • Client instructions

  • Contract amendments or changes

  • Other significant transaction-related discussions

• Text messages that document key transaction details should be treated as part of the official record.

3. Electronic Communication

• While Indiana law does not explicitly name text messages, electronic communications such as emails are considered part of the record-keeping requirements. This interpretation often includes text messages, particularly when they contain material information about a transaction.

• Brokers and agents should consider text messages to be part of their transaction records if they are used to conduct or document business activities.

4. Method of Archiving

• Indiana law does not prescribe a specific method for archiving electronic communications, but all records must be secure, accessible, and retrievable for the entire retention period.

• To comply, brokers can archive text messages by:

  • Printing and filing them with transaction records

  • Using digital tools or software designed for secure message archiving

  • Exporting text messages to digital formats and storing them securely

5. Consequences of Non-Compliance

• Failing to retain required records, including text messages, can result in disciplinary action by the Indiana Real Estate Commission.

• Potential consequences include fines, suspension, or revocation of a real estate license.

• Additionally, missing documentation may increase liability risks in disputes or legal claims, as incomplete records can hinder a broker’s ability to defend their actions.

Summary

In Indiana, real estate brokers must retain all communications, including text messages, that are material to a transaction for at least five years. Proper archiving of text messages ensures compliance with Indiana’s record-keeping laws and reduces the risk of liability. Brokers are advised to implement systems to securely capture and store relevant electronic communications to meet these requirements.

​

E&O Risk

The risk to a brokerage concerning errors and omissions (E&O) insurance in relation to record retention of text messages and electronic communications is significant. E&O insurance generally provides protection against claims of negligence, misrepresentation, and failure to perform duties as expected. If a brokerage fails to archive important communications—including text messages—that document critical aspects of a real estate transaction, it can expose the brokerage to increased liability, and E&O insurance may not fully cover the consequences in certain situations. Here are key risks and considerations:

1. Potential for Gaps in Transaction Records:

   • If a brokerage does not properly archive text messages that contain vital transaction information (such as offers, counteroffers, client instructions, or contract amendments), it may create gaps in the documentation of a transaction. In a dispute, the absence of these records can weaken the brokerage's ability to defend itself and may lead to claims that cannot be fully supported or disproven.

   • If critical communications are missing, clients may allege that the brokerage acted negligently or misrepresented information, and E&O insurance may not cover claims if the brokerage did not follow industry standards for record-keeping.

2. Violation of Regulatory Requirements:

   • Most states have regulations that require brokers to retain all material records for specific periods. Failing to comply with these record-keeping regulations can lead to regulatory penalties and disciplinary actions by the state real estate commission.

   • E&O insurance often does not cover regulatory fines or penalties, meaning that the brokerage could be solely responsible for any costs incurred as a result of non-compliance.

3. Increased Likelihood of Claims Due to Incomplete Communication Records:

   • In the absence of complete and accessible records, brokerages may face higher risks of claims alleging failure to disclose, miscommunication, or misunderstanding of terms. This is particularly relevant in real estate transactions where documentation of all communications is critical to resolving any disputes that arise.

   • Without comprehensive records (including relevant text messages), brokerages may struggle to prove they acted appropriately, which can lead to larger settlements or judgments that may impact their E&O policy premiums or insurability.

4. Possible E&O Policy Exclusions:

   • Many E&O policies have exclusions related to "known wrongful acts" or "acts of intentional non-compliance." If a brokerage knowingly neglects to retain necessary records, or if record-keeping negligence is proven, E&O coverage may be limited or denied for claims resulting from this oversight.

   • Insurers may consider a failure to retain legally required records as an act outside the scope of covered professional services, thus potentially excluding coverage for claims related to missing documentation.

5. Impact on Policy Renewals and Premiums:

   • Repeated or severe claims arising from record-keeping issues can impact the brokerage's insurance premiums, making it more expensive to maintain E&O coverage.

   • If a pattern of poor documentation or non-compliance with record retention is identified, an E&O insurer may choose not to renew a brokerage's policy, forcing the brokerage to seek other (potentially more costly) insurance options.

6. Defensibility in Claims Situations:

   • Retaining text messages and other communications can be crucial in defending against claims. For instance, if a client claims that a certain promise or representation was made, well-kept records can help demonstrate what was actually communicated.

   • Without archived text messages, a brokerage may have to rely solely on testimony, which may not be as persuasive as contemporaneous written records in legal proceedings.

Risk Mitigation Strategies for Brokerages

To mitigate these risks, brokerages should:

• Establish a clear policy for retaining all relevant electronic communications, including text messages, emails, and digital correspondence, and ensure all agents are trained to comply.

• Invest in archiving technology that captures and stores electronic communications in a secure, accessible, and compliant manner.

• Regularly audit compliance with record-keeping policies to ensure agents are properly retaining required communications and that records are easily retrievable.

• Work closely with E&O providers to understand the requirements and best practices for documentation to ensure comprehensive coverage.

By maintaining thorough, organized records of all communications, including text messages, a brokerage can better protect itself against claims, demonstrate regulatory compliance, and strengthen its defensibility if claims arise, thereby optimizing its E&O insurance coverage and reducing the risk of adverse financial consequences.